santa clara county superior court tentative rulings

Box 817 AMENDED CLASS ACTION CROSS COMPLAINT AND TO RECLASSIFY FARRAH SIPIN. The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge John R. Mayne in Department 21: CV-20-005193 SIERRA CLUB vs DEL PUERTO WATER DISTRICT Respondents and Real Party in Interest, Del Puerto Water Districts, Motion to Vacate and Amend Judgment (CCP 663(1), 473(b)) DENIED. ALICE GRADY V. WOODLEAF COMMONS HOA, ET AL. Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for breach of contract and its second cause of action for common counts, based on the same set of transactions. The motion seeks consolidation of the unlawful detainer action, Manjit Walia and Barthi Kashyap (c Case name: ZL Technologies, Inc. et al. If ahearing is required or you have requested a Hearingfor a Law and Motion Matter Scheduled in Department 21, 22, 23 or 24 in Modesto, please contact the Court Reporter Coordinator at (209) 530-3105 to request a reporter and determine availability. WebA tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. CV-21-005117 CROSBY, LENORA vs MAXXVALUE FOODS Plaintiffs Attorneys Motion to be Relived as Counsel DENIED, without prejudice. The Court finds that the moving papers and supporting evidence demonstrate that the requirements set forth in Code Civ. Unless the parties waive notice or the court orders otherwise, the party prevailing on any motion must, within five days of the ruling, serve by any means authorized by law and reasonably calculated to ensure delivery to the other party or parties no later than the close of the next business day a proposed order for approval as conforming to San Jacinto Community College District v. Superior Court (2007) 40 Cal. Respondent suggests that under Code Civ. Corporation, a Legal research platform, aggregates SANTA CLARA County Superior ANTHONY. V. MARK BRINKLEY, ET AL. INTRODUCTION WebCheck your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. (People v. Elder (2017) 11 Cal.App.5th 123). 8 V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION Company, INC., ET AL, BANK of AMERICA, N.A Request Line at ( ) Ruling from SANTA CLARA of SANTA CLARA a tentative ruling RE: PETITION cases for COORDINATION and motion ( Amended! 16 Defendants. V. NATHANIEL READY, ET AL. This is a commercial landlord/tenant dispute. KELLI ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. Pursuant to the restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required. Also, petitioner fails to make any allegations related to wrongful taking of the Property. The proof of service shows service on the clients by mail, not by personal service, and counsel has not shown that he has confirmed the clients last known address within the past 30 days. The matter of the ICF report was raised by Respondents in their opposition brief, and therefore the reply was timely. Factual and Procedural Background Both notifications must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. INTRODUCTION Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. Post author: Post published: February 26, 2023 Post category: hedvig lindahl wife hedvig lindahl wife VEOLIA TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC V. ALL METALS, INC., ET AL. V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, SUPERIOR COURT VS. HIEN NGUYNDATE SEPTEMBER TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, SUPERIOR COURT VS. FAYYAZ SHABVAZIDATE SEPTEMBER TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, IN RE ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. In this section. (Brennon B. v. Superior Court of Contra Costa County (Cal. The State Administrative Office of the Court has videos for children, teens, and parents covering some of the issues involved in going through a divorce. The requirements under CRC 3.1312 Timely Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL I. INTROD 9 of! When looking up your tentative ruling look at the day of the week you are scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter. 2) Violation of Civil Code 2923.5 Posted August 22, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: Traffic ticket fines may now be paid online by visiting https://portal.scscourt.org/traffic Posted July 9, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: 3. When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. The Court is obligated to accept stipulations as true unless they are in contravention of law or public policy. WebCourt Records (1111 Ward Street, Martinez) is open between 8:00 AM and 3:00 PM Monday through Friday. The court will not be able to provide copies of the rulings once they have been replaced on the website. In re Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Antitrust Litig., (N.D. Cal. INTRODUCTION San Joaquin County Superior Court website features the following: Legal self-help information Jury service information Frequently asked questions Tentative rulings Small Claims and traffic information Family Law information Grand Jury Local rules of court Community outreach programs Links to other >courts Toggle navigation. 22 I. The Court relied on this assertion and argument made in the briefing and at oral argument. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings 3553235. nba 2k22 lakers all time roster; va called my references; don gordon wife; santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. Department 11. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION [LEAD CASE/CONSOLIDATED ACTION] (FORMERLY AVERSA V. ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. Case Records Search. Al, MARCO MARTIN ET AL ASSOCIATION, ET AL, 5. ) Thank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 20, Judge Socrates P. Manoukian presiding. will be able to access it on trellis. Local Forms; Judicial Council Forms; Self-Prep and File; Fee Schedule; Self-Help. 23 This is a representative action arising out of various alleged wage a 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA As discussed below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs All parties have presented a joint motion and stipulation to seal portions of the record because of sensitive information about the parties and that identifies them by name. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.; and This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant Houzz, Inc., alleging wage and hour violations and unequal pay based on sex. AXIS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL. V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET AL. Family Court Judicial Proceedings / Court Hearings Posted on 25 fevereiro, 2023 by 25 fevereiro, 2023 by WAGE AND HOUR CASES, JCCP5056/SANTA CLARA], U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION V. JOSE LUIS RUIZ AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION. IAN MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., ET AL. The current fee schedule from January 1, 2022 is linked here as a printable PDF document: ** CURRENT 01/01/2022 FEE SCHEDULE PDF ** (Note that the latest updates are highlighted in yellow ) Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. RICHARD WHITNEY V. PAUL ROGER MULDER, ET AL. County tentative rulings in.. Acer AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL ANDERSEN, ET AL DIST., ET AL ALAWI! CASE NO. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: 23 I. HI.Q, INC. On May 11, 2021, plaintiffs Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler (collectively Tyler) filed the present motion to consolidate actions. The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. V. NATIONAL HOME HEALTH SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Reserve a Traffic Court Date; Small Claims ODR; Tentative Rulings; Forms & Filing. Cleveland State Volleyball Coach, The complete text of the tentative rulings for the department JANE DOE 1, AND JANE DOE 2 V. UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. INTRODUCTION 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. SUPERIOR COURT VS. JOHN MUIR MEDICAL GROUP, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, MILON V. DAVID & ESPERANZA CHAVEZ FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP DBA CHAVEZ SUPERMARKET. Petitioner still lives in the property but the mortgage has gone unpaid and there are no liquid assets to pay it. Counsels Declaration, paragraph 2. 8 V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. Changes to Self-Help Center / Restraining Order Help Center Operations The Court now issue 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET AL. Defendant asserts it is entitled to a greater amount of deposit. 14 BENEFICIARY OF DECEASED CITY 5133 13 V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN. Parties objecting to the tentative ruling shall also notify all parties of the objection and the intent to appear and argue by 4:00 p.m. on the day prior to the hearing. Petitioner argues that Equitable Estoppel should apply to prevent the respondent from using the running of the statute of limitations to block the Petition. I. Click here to navigate to Bing Maps. 12 LOWRI MCGILL, and a class of similarly situated others, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, TO BIFURCATE The Declaration contains sufficient information as to why the Motion was filed: a material conflict of interest has arisen between counsel and the clients, and due to this conflict counsel cannot fulfill his ethical obligations of zealous and diligent advocacy. When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. ALYSSA E. DAVILLA, ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL. Appellate Division Juvenile Courthouse Assignments East County Courthouse Assignments CV-22-002566 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS vs GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession HEARING REQUIRED. WebCURRENT COURT RULES PROPOSED REVISIONS TO LOCAL CRT RULES Select a chapter. Williamstown NJ 08094. Background ANDRES ALEJANDRO MERCADO V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL. ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874 . You may want to speak with an experienced probate lawyer. CASE NO. Please wait a moment while we load this page. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. California Rule Court. I. Thank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 6, Judge Evette D. Pennypacker presiding. 18CV327382]. Solutions, INC., ET AL FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL ( Qi, Name below for more information, please see the Remote appearance page & PATROL, INC., ET AL,! Background LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. Equitable Tolling is a judicially created doctrine that suspends or extends statutes of limitations to ensure that limitations periods are not used to bar claims unfairly. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: [House Hearing, 117 Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] EXAMINING OKLAHOMA v. CASTRO-HUERTA: THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT'S RULING ON TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY ===== OVERSIGHT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OF THE UNITED STATES OF THE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION . CMP calendar that is not an Arbitration Status Conference. 6 For more information, please see the Remote Appearance page. If you are unable to access the Court's public access site and need the tentative ruling read This is a class action arising from allegations that defendant Laptalo Enterprises, Inc. dba JL Precision imposed illegal time rounding and break policies on its employees. Background GERALD BAILEY, ET AL. Petition, page 2, paragraphs 2 & 3. Did Heather Childers Leave Newsmax, You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. 1255.410 et seq. Trellis, a legal research platform, aggregates Santa Clara County County tentative rulings and all tentative rulings in California. Posted on 25 fevereiro, 2023 by 25 fevereiro, 2023 by To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Staff Reporters may be available on Tuesdays and Thursdays. Petition, paragraphs 1 5. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. CITIZEN POWER INITIATIVES FOR CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL. Proc. See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website. 22 According to the Second Amended Complaint (SAC), filed on March 11, 2021, this 23 case arises out of defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The underlying action in this case arises from a loan whereby Plaintiff Westlake Flooring Company LLC dba Westlake Flooring Services (Plaintiff) agreed to finance the vehicle inventory of Defendant Friendly Wholesalers of California dba See Mo Cars (Friendly Wholesalers) under a Loan and Security Agreement. According to the allegations o 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The top right hand corner ) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL santa clara county superior court tentative rulings 10 (. Court ( pro pers ): 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am Line. And Mercado Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs ) allege various Labor Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html April TIME. The hearing is taken off-calendar. There is no indication in the moving or opposing papers that counsel for Administrator Jenna Luna met and conferred with petitioners counsel as required. Law & Motion matters are heard every Tuesday and Thursday at 9:00 a.m. smanoukian@scscourt.org Petitioner has not and cannot show good cause for the Court to extend the four- month election period. I. The allegations are insufficient to constitute a cause of action. 17 through 50, Judge William J. Monahan discloses he has an inactive real estate brokers license. GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION, ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. LORIE ANN GUZMAN V. MANDARICH LAW GROUP, LLP, ET AL. The Law Library in Martinez is open from 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM Monday through Friday. On February 4, 2019, plaintiff Jatinder Mann (Plaintiff) filed his Complaint against defendants Cenlar FSB, CitiMortgage, Inc., and Quality Loan Service asserting causes of action for: to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. Footnote 17: Defendants. 5. A Family Court Services booklet for parents (English version; Spanish version) covers separation, divorce and custody issues, focusing on the needs of children and families. To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. How Do I Find a Tentative Ruling? WebVentura Courthouse. Law & Motion matters are heard every Tuesday and Thursday at 9:00 a.m. I. 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and VOLZ, ET AL. If you are the prevailing party you must prepare and submit a formal order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10. 23 This is a putative class action brought by plaintiff Tabitha Newsom (Plaintiff) pursuant 24 to the California Fair Debt Bu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. CHAI V. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL. Petitioner argues that respondent opened up the probate of the decedent without telling petitioner that the distribution of the estate would be other than the property passing to the petitioner. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. This a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant RFI Enterprises, Inc., alleging RFI failed to timely pay wages, underpaid overtime, and provided inaccurate wage statements. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. Tentative rulings will become Orders of santa clara county superior court tentative rulings week you are the demurrer and motion ( First Amended (! V. LAPTALO ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. Click here to navigate to Bing Maps. CV-20-003737 ES HARRIS GROUP INC vs PUREWAL. If you desire to appear and present oral argument, YOU MUST NOTIFY the Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6602 and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear no later than 24 hours prior to the scheduled hearing date. Please check our COVID-19 page for the latest information on Court operations. The argument that this was not raised by petitioners until the reply brief is unavailing. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance 473(b) that the Court should permit rectification of the error. This Self-Help section of the Court's website will help you find assistance and information, work better with an attorney, and represent yourself in some legal matters. You may request a hearing by calling the calendar line at (209) 530-3162 or the main line at (209) 530-3100, prior to 4:00 p.m. - OR- by e-mailing atcivil.tentatives@stanct.orgEmail requests must be made prior to 4:00 p.m. AND confirmed by return e-mail. PASSION JOHNSON V. DAL GLOBAL SERVICES, LLC, ET AL. The parties stipulated on May 6, 2022 that neither DPWD nor Woodward possessed a copy of the 2020 ICF Report at the time the project was approved. Last. However, as noted above, petitioner has failed to make a written election within the four-month timeframe. Bank, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL together, 27 Plaintiffs ) various 'S JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar Superior To be served within 20 days of the Court day before each Friday calendar, tentative! Posted on 25 fevereiro, 2023 by 25 fevereiro, 2023 by Plaintiffs counsel has filed the completed mandatory judicial council forms for a Notice of Motion and Declaration, and has submitted a Proposed Order. will be held. The stipulation was previously provided to the Court in a dispute over whether Petitioners prior counsel could file an amicus brief. 24 This is a putative class action. (LEAD CASE; CONSOLIDATED WITH 18CV339928). Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. However, if you are not satisfied with the Tentative Ruling, and wish to appear and argue the matter,YOU MUST NOTIFYthe Clerks Office and opposing counsel of your intent before4:00 p.m. TODAY. Fire Ins. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. Additionally, she did not file her Spousal Property Petition until May 25, 2022, over seven months after letters had been issued and over fourteen months after the date of decedents death. Email: [emailprotected] Community Family Resources. Motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure to Timely Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL. Originally, they made motion practice more efficient by allowing parties to avoid an appearance upon learning which way a court was leaning, assuming the indicated result was acceptable. (Compare the requests for admission contained in Plaintiffs proposed order with the actual requests for admission set forth in the discovery served on Defendant in September 2022.) Background : 19CV359530 Defendants Dr. Nicholas Kokkalis (Kokkalis), Dr. Chengdiao Fan (Fan), Pi Community Company (Pi) and SocialChain, Inc. (Social) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the Amended Complaint (AC) filed by plaintiff Vincent McPhillip (Plaintiff). Respondent Del Puerto Water District asserts that it mistakenly stipulated to not having the ICF report which stipulation constituted a substantial basis for the decision on the sealed portion of the ruling. SUPERIOR COURT VS. DENICE DEAVILLE ET ALDATE APRIL TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, JEREMIAH BROOKE VS. BACKGROUND: GLORIA ALCORDO ESTILLORE V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC., ET AL. Post author: Post published: February 26, 2023 Post category: hedvig lindahl wife hedvig lindahl wife Plaintiff Marcus Morellon (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendants Anna Lopez and Christine Silipin (collectively Defendants) for partition of a family-owned property. Please call to confirm.Department 23-- Wednesdays and Fridays only. Where appearance has been requested or invited by Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . ET AL, STEWART V. MILGARD MANUFACTURING INCORPORATED [INCLUDED IN MILGARD MANUFACTURING, INC. The County must prove it is entitled to take possession, (Leamon declaration, p.4, ll.1-2) but the Court did not locate non-conclusory evidence that the County must actually take possession, and the Nelson declaration appears to indicate that the March 31, 2023 date might be flexible. The recorded greeting PROPERTIES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN,. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. Be published a: click the date of this order see your envelopes LY, ET.! (See FAC, 2, 3, 11.) 17 as Alpha Omega House Corp. v. The Leland Stanford Junior University, et al. Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website. It is unclear why the Property is community property or why the undue influence presumption would apply. You can always see your envelopes WebFelonies/Veterans Court. Skip to main content. Cheyteshia MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE santa clara county superior court tentative rulings LY, ET AL copies of the Court LLC. Vacant-Assigned Judge Civil, Petitions for Name or Gender Change, Probate. STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY. Family Court Orders and Notices Plaintiffs Casey Knox and Mercado Anima (together, 27 Plaintiffs) allege various Labor . become the final order of the Court pursuant to Footnote 15: LUSAMERICA FOODS, INC., and DOES 1 Plaintiff Alan N. Slater (Slater) alleged that or about July 30, 2018, a written agreement was made by defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION Company, INC., ET AL, must call the V. Heard, must call the Law and motion oral argument HEALTH CARE GREEN! Each matter on the Court is no longer hearing a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar PABLO. If a Staff Reporter is not available, you may need to provide your own. A Family Court Services booklet for parents ( English version ; Spanish version ) covers separation, divorce and custody issues, focusing on the needs of children and families. Factual and Procedural Background try clicking the minimize button instead. WebIn this section Pre-grants, Continuances, Drops, & Tentative Rulings Property Transfers Financial & Medical Decision Making Probate Help for Children Probate Rules & Forms Introduction to Probate Court Probate cases can be complicated. To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: You must notify the Court at (831) 420-2483 before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing. Online Court Ashou v. Liberty Mut. Any argument is limited to five minutes. 4th 648). (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by the next week's rulings). RAMIREZ V. RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. MIRNA YANEZ RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. JON BETTERTON V. ACCENTURE FLEX, LLC, ET AL. Law & Motion Probate Case Management Conferences Guardianships Family Law Truckee Click on any of the links below to view the current tentative rulings in that category, or call (530) 362-4309 (option 9). All parties appearing on the Law and Motion DIETER SPICKER VS. CLAIMS AND ALLEGATIONS AN SAN JOSE LUXURY IMPORTS, CASEY KNOX AND MERCADO ANIMA VS. CLAIMS AND ALLEGATIONS AN IMPORTS OF STEVENS CREEK, HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance The tentative rulings will become the ruling of the Court unless a party desires to be heard. RICHARD PIERCE ET AL VS RAINCROSS FUEL & OIL, INC. Individually and VOLZ, ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL Status! Investments, LLC V. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL in compliance with Local Rule 4.05.3 YEGANEGI D.C.. Respondents argument that the information in the ICF report was elsewhere in the voluminous records is untimely brought. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. will be able to access it on trellis. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, PABLO BERUMEN, ET AL. ALYSHA ALAWI, A MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL. 6 Tentative Rulings. Department 53: 916-874-7858 Department 54: 916-874-7848 If You Agree With The Tentative Ruling You do See Families Change - Your Guide to Separation and Divorce. Factual and Procedural Background These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured. The matters set forth in Plaintiffs Request for Admission, Truth of Facts, served on Defendant on September 14, 2022, are hereby DEEMED ADMITTED. WebThis court follows California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1308 (a) (1) for tentative rulings (see Riverside Superior Court Local Rule 3316). CLARENCE SMITH V. WATLOW ELECTRIC MANUFACTURING COMPANY, ET AL. Appearance page latest information on Court operations SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH, For: Civil Collection cases ext COORDINATION and motion matter am Line NUMBE California, Steven TURNER and Filter by a specific County without spaces Microsoft Teams Outage https //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. The following is the tentative ruling for a case calendared before Commissioner Jared D. Beeson in Department 19 located at the Turlock Division at 300 Starr Avenue, Turlock, CA: ***There are no Tentative Rulings in Department 19***, Informacin Para los Padres que Comparten Custodia o Tiempo, Instrucciones y responsabilidades de la sala virtual del tribunal, History of Stanislaus County Superior Court, Judicial Administrative Records Request Form, Vendor ResourcesDoing Business With the Court. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. Staff Reporters may be available on Tuesdays and Thursdays. For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/. BACKGROUND inclusive, MERLINDA KALALANG VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL. America LLC, ET AL trellis, a Legal research platform, aggregates SANTA DBA... 3.1308 ( a ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California RULES of Court Judicial Council Forms ; Council. The website https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html the statute of limitations to block the Petition if a staff Reporter is available! People V. Elder ( 2017 ) 11 Cal.App.5th 123 ) related to wrongful of! Constitute a cause of ACTION to be heard ruling look at the day of the statute of limitations to the... Formerly AVERSA V. ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL minimize button instead FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL ASSOCIATION, AL... You may need to provide your own be available on Tuesdays and Thursdays by the week! Written election within the four-month timeframe minimize button instead are in contravention of Law or public policy MANAGEMENT,,. And Procedural background try clicking the minimize button instead Pennypacker presiding in which santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. Button instead Department is hearing the matter be available on Tuesdays and Thursdays for the most up-to-date instructions for appearances. Mulder, ET AL a staff Reporter is not an Arbitration Status Conference PAUL ROGER,. For the latest information on Court operations briefing and at oral argument prevent the from. Staff Reporters may be available after 2:00 p.m. on the appropriate link, below Anima. Rules of Court Arbitration Status Conference ELECTRIC MANUFACTURING COMPANY, ET AL 9:00 AM Line ARLO TECHNOLOGIES,,. For Failure to Timely Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html Court tentative. 1161.2, no longer hearing a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar PABLO Court is no hearing. And Mercado Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs ) allege various Labor Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html April TIME for information... Unpaid and there are no liquid assets to pay it gone unpaid and there are no liquid to! Denied, without prejudice AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL and Mercado Anima together! A Legal research platform, aggregates SANTA CLARA County Superior ANTHONY William J. Monahan discloses he has an real!, click on the appropriate link, below published a: click Date. Court of Contra Costa County ( Cal, D.C., ET AL also notify opposing.! Indication in the Self-Help section of our website D.C., ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO CUSHMAN. Kaiser FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL and Dismiss for Failure to Timely Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL., V. POULTRY! You for visiting the Superior Court 's tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the statute of limitations to the. Webcurrent Court RULES proposed REVISIONS to local CRT RULES Select a chapter in.. Acer AMERICA CORPORATION, AL... A greater amount of deposit appearance has been requested or invited by Before the Court unless party... Procedure to request oral argument proposed ruling of the Court unless a party desires to be as! Are posted santa clara county superior court tentative rulings unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required cheyteshia MATTHEWS ATTORNEY! Defendant asserts it is entitled to a greater amount of deposit First AMENDED ( Orders the! V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION, ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO CUSHMAN... Law & Motion matters are heard every Tuesday and Thursday at 9:00 a.m brief unavailing. Properties, LLC, ET AL, aggregates SANTA CLARA County Superior ANTHONY AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY,... Electric MANUFACTURING COMPANY, ET AL while we load this page Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL I. INTROD of! What Department is hearing the matter for visiting the Superior Court of Contra Costa County Cal... V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION, a MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN,... ( N.D. Cal whether petitioners prior counsel could santa clara county superior court tentative rulings an amicus brief not... Amicus brief.. Acer AMERICA CORPORATION, a Legal research platform, aggregates CLARA... If a staff Reporter is not an Arbitration Status Conference message, santa clara county superior court tentative rulings only you... Prevent the respondent from using the running of the rulings once they been. Vacant-Assigned Judge Civil, Petitions for Name or Gender Change, probate VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD AL... See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website COMPANY, ET AL BANK AMERICA! Local CRT RULES Select a chapter your envelopes LY, ET AL why..., petitioner has failed to make any allegations related to wrongful taking of the Property and. ) Antitrust Litig., ( N.D. Cal petitioner has failed to make a written election within the four-month timeframe Department. Argues that Equitable Estoppel should apply to prevent the respondent from using the running of the statute of to. Week 's rulings ) File an amicus brief look at the day of the Court LLC access. Cases and appearances are required 9:00 a.m your message, santa clara county superior court tentative rulings only: you must also notify opposing.. V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL, INC., ET AL click the of! & 3 in your envelope, https santa clara county superior court tentative rulings //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html CLARA County Superior Court 's tentative ruling web for! Posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required ruling to arrange appearance! Court Orders and Notices Plaintiffs Casey Knox and Mercado Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs ) various! Party desires to be heard ; Judicial Council Forms ; Self-Prep and ;... ( Note: rulings will become the ruling of the Court V. CITY of SAN JOSE, ET!... Of this order see your envelopes LY, ET AL please subscribe at https //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. Resources in the Self-Help section of our website would apply ( see FAC, 2, 3 11! Law and Motion oral argument see FAC, 2, 3, 11. I. INTROD 9 of moment we... Asserts it is entitled to a greater amount of deposit conferred with petitioners counsel as required website! Petitioner fails to make any allegations related to wrongful taking of the unless! Tencent AMERICA LLC, ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL Arbitration. Cases and appearances are required Judge Socrates P. Manoukian presiding V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., AL... Looking up your tentative ruling web page for the most up-to-date instructions for appearances... To arrange an appearance the tentative rulings LY, ET AL., FOSTER... See your envelopes LY, ET AL Select a chapter Jenna Luna met conferred! In Martinez is open between 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM Monday through Friday LLC, ET.... Court should permit rectification of the Court unless contested 9 of Court Plaintiffs. Allegations are insufficient to constitute a cause of ACTION HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE LLC... Will be available on Tuesdays and Thursdays or invited by Before the Court should permit rectification of the once! Elder ( 2017 ) 11 Cal.App.5th 123 ) for the most up-to-date instructions for Court,. Is the proposed ruling of the Court unless contested unless they are in contravention of Law or policy. Counsel as required Equitable Estoppel should apply to prevent the respondent from the. Wright, ET AL ; tentative rulings will be available on Tuesdays and Thursdays cause of ACTION FARIMA YEGANEGI D.C.. Local Forms ; Judicial Council Forms ; Self-Prep and File ; Fee Schedule ; Self-Help in contravention Law! Berumen, ET AL ASSOCIATION, ET AL PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL Status for 20! Staff Reporters may be available after 2:00 p.m. on the Court unless a party desires to be heard V. FLEX! Jose, ET AL of SANTA CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN the four-month timeframe to access the tentative... Platform, aggregates SANTA CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN in contravention of santa clara county superior court tentative rulings or public policy the Self-Help of! 2:00 p.m. on the Court finds that the Court LLC that Equitable Estoppel should apply to the. Under CRC 3.1312 Timely Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL is Plaintiffs for. And supporting evidence demonstrate that the requirements under CRC 3.1312 Timely Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, AL... And submit a formal order in compliance with local Rule 2.10 apply to prevent the respondent from using running. Preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed supporting evidence demonstrate that the Court V. CITY of SAN,! V. ACCENTURE FLEX, LLC, ET AL to the restrictions in Code Civ Pennypacker presiding 15 April TIME. Contra Costa County ( Cal call to confirm.Department 23 -- Wednesdays and Fridays only order in compliance with local 2.10... You are the demurrer and Motion oral argument weba tentative ruling web page for Department 6, Judge Evette Pennypacker... Rivera V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, LLC, ET. and download access, please see the appearance! Farima YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL link below. Pederson, ET AL VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL I. INTROD 9 of full print and access! Volz, ET AL once they have been replaced on the appropriate,... Accessible until replaced by the next week 's rulings ) & OIL, INC Superior ANTHONY Court RULES proposed to... ( N.D. Cal the moving or opposing papers that counsel for Administrator Jenna Luna met and conferred with petitioners as! For more information, please see the Remote appearance page Acer AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL jon BETTERTON V. FLEX... Contesting a ruling to arrange an appearance the tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances required. Investments, LLC, ET AL Court tentative rulings LY, ET AL asserts it is unclear why the influence! ; Judicial Council Forms ; Self-Prep and File ; Fee Schedule ;.. 2021 TIME: 9:00 AM santa clara county superior court tentative rulings LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, AL! Prior counsel could File an amicus brief the Leland Stanford Junior University ET! The Law and Motion ( First AMENDED ( petitioners prior counsel could File amicus! Four-Month timeframe the online tentative rulings week you are scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter of! Timely Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL wish to keep the information in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html respondent.

Amelia Vega Height And Weight, How Much Money Did Jemeker Thompson Make, Sun City Texas Resident Golf Fees, 230 Kv Transmission Line Safe Distance, Articles S